ChatGPT is impressive, but it's equally confident when it's right as when it's wrong, which can cause problems if you're trying to learn from it and don't know how to recognize the difference.
No, ChatGPT is not a credible source of factual information and can't be cited for this purpose in academic writing. While it tries to provide accurate answers, it often gets things wrong because its responses are based on patterns, not facts and data.
The model generates text based on patterns in the training data, but it does not have the ability to verify the accuracy of the information it generates. As a result, its outputs can contain inaccuracies, errors, and false information.
ChatGPT was created by OpenAI, an AI research company. It started as a nonprofit company in 2015 but became for-profit in 2019. Its CEO is Sam Altman, who also co-founded the company. OpenAI released ChatGPT as a free “research preview” in November 2022.
Your name, your address, your telephone number, even the name of your first pet…all big no nos when it comes to ChatGPT. Anything personal such as this can be exploited to impersonate you, which fraudsters could use to infiltrate private accounts, or carry out impersonation scams – none of which is good news for you.
Chat GPT is generally considered to be safe to use.
This means that it is able to generate text that is both accurate and relevant. However, there are some potential risks associated with using Chat GPT. For example, it is possible that Chat GPT could generate text that is biased or harmful.
The problem with having ChatGPT or any other AI write articles is that it will be wrong or do a poor job, and it will lead to lawsuits. Take the latest drama at CNET and Bankrate, two websites owned by Red Ventures that ran AI-generated content as informational articles without being transparent about it.
ChatGPT gets its information from material it finds on the internet. That means it might include copyrighted material in its answers, or infringe on intellectual property rights. If this happens, and you move forward with publishing, be prepared for legal fees.
Is ChatGPT content copyrighted? According to OpenAI's Content Policy and Terms of Use, users of ChatGPT own all the output they create with the LLM, including text and images.
ChatGPT is owned by OpenAI, an AI research laboratory that was founded in 2015 by Sam Altman, Elon Musk, and other prominent figures including Peter Theil, Ilya Sutskever, Jessica Livingston, Reid Hoffman, Greg Brockman, Wojciech Zaremba, and John Schulman.
Yes, Turnitin can also detect paraphrased content that you have taken from Chat GPT. If you are smart then Turnitin is smarter than you and you can not make a fool of it.
ChatGPT isn't always trustworthy and is not considered a credible source for use in academic writing. Note If you use ChatGPT to write your assignment for you, most institutions will consider this plagiarism (or at least academic dishonesty), even if you cite the source. We don't recommend using ChatGPT in this way.
ChatGPT (the free version) makes up citations that don't exist. ChatGPT might give you articles by an author that usually writes about your topic, or even identify a journal that published on your topic, but the title, pages numbers, and dates are completely fictional.
This is because its responses are based on patterns it has seen in the text that it was trained on. It does not answer based on a database of facts but rather based on patterns, and this can lead to unintentional errors.
You should not trust ChatGPT's results unconditionally. While you can use ChatGPT during your studies to clarify questions, you should always double-check the answers you receive against other credible sources, as it doesn't always give correct information. Don't cite ChatGPT as a source of factual information.
For nonlawyers interested in using ChatGPT, a lingering question is this: Are there legal risks in having a machine create legitimate-looking documents for you? The answer is yes. There are risks that AI chatbots could infringe on intellectual-property rights, create defamatory content, and breach data-protection laws.
AI-Generated Content and Google's Algorithm: While AI tools like ChatGPT can produce high-quality, engaging content, Google has introduced policies against “scaled content abuse,” which targets low-quality, AI-generated spam.
Yes, you can sell them, but so can anyone else. You can put them into stock image sites (if the stock image site terms of service allow), but so can anyone else, and no one is obligated to pay them or you for their use.
One of the main concerns is that using Chat GPT could lead to a lack of originality in the finished product. Because Chat GPT is trained on existing text, there is a risk that the content it produces could be too similar to existing works, which could be seen as plagiarism or copyright infringement.
The bottom line is, in cases of AI-human collaboration, copyright law only protects "the human-authored aspects of the work." This doesn't mean you can't copyright works created with the help of AI software. You just have to be clear about which parts you created and which ones have been created with the help of AI.
If you aren't happy with its first attempt, you can ask ChatGPT to rewrite your essay and you'll get a new version, again in mere seconds. And you can do this as many times as you like. Using the software may help you get over writer's block and provide inspiration.
While ChatGPT excels at language manipulation, it's not designed to evaluate the quality or relevance of research papers. It might recommend sources that are outdated, contain flawed methodologies, or lack credibility. You risk basing your research on shaky foundations if you rely solely on ChatGPT's suggestions.
Knowing full well that I am a content expert, several people turned their attention to me, and one blatantly said, “Professional writers should be nervous.” Having already tested ChatGPT – and having loved it – I only smiled. But his point was clear: ChatGPT changes the game for written content production.
